On 11/26/11 12:26 PM, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: > If it should be sorted[1], it should really be sorted in the reverse > order of distfile-download size. That would be extremely useful on > systems with slow internet connections. [...] > > 1. I'm obviously assuming that dep nodes that do not depend on each > other would be sorted
Seconded. I think practical reasons are more important than an arbitrary order, and I'd also benefit from this download-oriented order.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
