On Dienstag 11 Oktober 2011 20:23:13 Markos Chandras wrote: > On 10/11/11 18:34, Rich Freeman wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 12:52 PM, Markos Chandras > > > <hwoar...@gentoo.org> wrote: > I understand your points but given the fact that we have no active QA > team to pick up the mess whenever needed (Diego can't do eveyrything > on his own) I will keep doing what I think it is best for Gentoo. If > you or others don't like that please take this to devrel, to QA, to > the president or to master Yoda. Before you(not your in particular) do > that though, make sure you double checked that I indeed violated the > official policy.
Now it's getting slightly ridiculous. We don't have an active QA team anymore because some people thought it detrimental that they even tried to enforce rules (which we gave ourselves, just as a reminder). Taking the resulting vacuum as a reason to just keep ignoring rules (which, by the way, every new recruit has to learn) is somehow taking the argument full circle. -- Andreas K. Huettel Gentoo Linux developer dilfri...@gentoo.org http://www.akhuettel.de/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
