Markos Chandras posted on Sun, 01 May 2011 22:08:31 +0100 as excerpted:

> Having the servers do that, will also allow us to provide cut down
> Changelogs ( lets say keep that last 10 entries ) so we can provide a
> more minimal portage tree, size wise.

What about cutting it to the largest whole number of entries that can fit 
in 4 KB, since many filesystems use 4 KB blocks anyway, with files always 
taking a whole number of blocks?

If the file's going to use 4 KB anyway, might as well take advantage of it.

Taking a look at the top of my last synced portage changelog as what's 
likely an example from the verbose end, that's thirteen entries, here, 
plus the header at the top.  For most packages I imagine it'd be something 
like 20 entries.

(Yes, I know some filesystems don't have that restriction and in fact use 
one myself, but if we're going for some arbitrary file size, 4 KB is about 
as reasonable a choice as it gets, precisely /because/ that's the default 
block size for so many widely used fss.)

-- 
Duncan - List replies preferred.   No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master."  Richard Stallman


Reply via email to