>>>>> On Sun, 6 Mar 2011, Christian Ruppert wrote: > This will convert the status of all bugs using the following > system:
> "NEW" will become "CONFIRMED" Weird. How can a newly added bug be "CONFIRMED", unless someone has taken some action to confirm it? > This change will be immediate. The history of each bug will also be > changed so that it appears that these statuses were always in > existence. So all bugs currently marked as "NEW" or "REOPENED" will change their status to "CONFIRMED"? That doesn't look right to me. Would that status change be visible in the bug's history? > So, do we want the new workflow or do we want to keep the old? If the new workflow implies such status changes on existing bugs, then keep the old one please. Ulrich
