Il giorno lun, 29/11/2010 alle 22.57 +0100, Andreas K. Huettel ha scritto: > > I have a personal suspicion, namely that libcblas.so is (on my > system) > actually (symlinked to) libgslcblas.so.0, and that maybe cmake reacts > because > the library filename is not equal its SONAME. Does this make sense? > And if > yes, what can I do about it?
No. As I have written already [1] & [2], there is no need for the filename and the soname to be related at all What I think the problem could be here is that libblas and libcblas/libgslcblas provide two different interfaces; clapack finds itself fine with libblas, but it doesn't find the required symbols in libcblas, so --as-needed discards the linking. I don't think I have the libraries around, maybe the tinderbox. Otherwise prod me on IRC/Jabber, it's faster, then we can post the results. [1] http://blog.flameeyes.eu/2010/10/08/linkers-and-names [2] http://blog.flameeyes.eu/2009/10/27/a-shared-library-by-any-other-name -- Diego Elio Pettenò — “Flameeyes” http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ If you found a .asc file in this mail and know not what it is, it's a GnuPG digital signature: http://www.gnupg.org/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
