On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 06:36:15 +0000
Graham Murray <gra...@gmurray.org.uk> wrote:

> Mike Frysinger <vap...@gentoo.org> writes:
> 
> > well, not quite.  the way we agreed in the past was to not revbump the 
> > masked 
> > package, but once it was unmasked, we revbump it just once at that point.

Gotcha.

> Is there somewhere which tells users when there are upgrades to
> toolchain packages which are not revbumped once they have been unmasked
> and in ~arch?

At least for gcc I put bug numbers and info into the ChangeLog.  If you're
fanatic you can subscribe to the gentoo-commits ml and set up some filters
(that's what I do ;)).

Generally if you're not actively hitting a showstopping bug, you don't need
the update.  And if you are, you're probably on the CC list in bugzilla.

> A case in point, glibc-2.12.1-r3. When I rebuilt this following the
> merging of linux-headers-2.6.36, the rebuilt downloaded about 700K of
> patches.

As Mike said, this was adding support for other architectures that were
previously not keyworded.


-- 
fonts, gcc-porting,                  it makes no sense how it makes no sense
toolchain, wxwidgets                           but i'll take it free anytime
@ gentoo.org                EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to