-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Dne 26.10.2010 18:13, Fabian Groffen napsal(a):
> Hi Tomáš,
> 
> On 26-10-2010 17:39:04 +0200, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
>> So since I would like to have this script replace current eshowkw one I
>> want to ask you for kind help on that script and review it and suggest
>> improvements.
>>
>> If the script lack some feature you really want to use also let me know,
>> maybe it wont be too hard to implement.
> 
> I havent looked at your implementation, but regarding your "screenshot",
> some questions, suggestions, remarks.
> 
> I think you should implement some means of selecting which archs you
> want to plot.  Preferably through some config file thing.  I'd think of
> specifying per arch, and or using predefined sets, e.g. to remove all
> prefix arches, since they spoil any output with huge unreadable
> matrices.
> 
> Have you ever played with rotating the view?  Some keywords are awfully
> long, like sparc64-solaris.  Most versions are shorter.
> In case the number of versions is small, you could even have the
> versions in columnar style (e.g. not vertical, just a column spanning a
> couple of chars), such that it is much better readable.
> 
> Maybe consider a raw, tab, csv alike output format, for easy parsing by
> other scripts?  Could perhaps handy to render it alternatively as xml,
> latex, etc.
> 
> Maybe introduce some more natural language mode?  E.g. some indication
> per version if all arches are keyworded, stable, per version what arches
> are still missing...
> 
Well whole concept of this eshowkw is completely modular, so these
features, at least keywords selection and ommiting prefix stuff is quite
easy to implement.
Not sure about the csv/raw output, but again displaying is just one
function, so it can be replaced :)

For the missing archs i think we can highlight all other achs if they
are lagging behind other and similar.

Thanks for pointers

Also so far only i wrote this stuff so i would like to ask if anyone
wants to chip in and help me (specially with profiling that thing and
making it faster, as i am not python programmer)

Tom
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkzHQagACgkQHB6c3gNBRYd4xwCcDK+XJLz9+pVIpjcoLG3MtJHC
aGoAn1C+8OQ8r2mH90+PysRdQK2vAGI3
=CQss
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to