On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 16:39:01 +0200 Jeroen Roovers <j...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 22:29:06 +0200 > Tomáš Chvátal <scarab...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > Is it time yet? I still find a lot of packages that do not even respect > LDFLAGS yet - when all these get fixed to respect LDFLAGS, we will > probably find yet more packages that are problematic with --as-needed. When you fix those packages to respect LDFLAGS you'll already hit any as-needed issues that might exist since it's on by default in the dev profiles. Enabling it in the user profiles doesn't change that. -- fonts, gcc-porting, and it's all by design toolchain, wxwidgets to keep us from losing our minds @ gentoo.org EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
