On 03/03/2010 07:45 PM, Mart Raudsepp wrote: > I don't think there was any such problem until poppler maintainers > decided to unsplit poppler into one big packages with USE flags again > instead of the nice split poppler, poppler-glib (that should have been > named poppler-cairo probably instead), poppler-qt3, poppler-qt4 and > poppler-utils.
If we could manage to convince poppler upstream that would be nice to actually provide bindings packages aside a core one... lu -- Luca Barbato Gentoo/linux http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero
