Am Samstag 26 Dezember 2009 06:47:51 schrieb Victor Ostorga: > On Fri, 25 Dec 2009 07:00:22 -0800 > > Joshua Saddler <nightmo...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 10:40:06 -0600 > > > > Victor Ostorga <vosto...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > # Víctor Ostorga <vosto...@gentoo.org> (23 Dec 2009) > > > # Last bump in 2005, does not build against current > > > # stable net-nds/openldap-2.4.19-r1 bug #247956 > > > # Removal in 30 days > > > net-dns/ldapdns > > > > So what about http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/ldapdns-guide.xml -- you > > want the GDP to just remove the doc? We can do that. > > Yes, it will be needed to remove the doc. > > > Is there a compatible drop-in replacement that will allow us to > > s/ldapdns/foo throughout the guide? > > Unfortunately, I don't know an exact replacemente for ldapdns, at some > point I heard about a LDAP sdb back-end for BIND 9 [1], but don't know > if it is still functional. > > [1] http://bind9-ldap.bayour.com/ > and also powerdns has ldap support the bind sdb ldap backand is in tree both ldap backands share the same ldap structure with some small diffferences
Mario
