-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 08:39:47PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> We also need to consider whether people even want it done exactly the
> way Portage does it now. Some developers have expressed a preference
> for a package.mask.d of some kind instead.
I saw that, and I'm not sure why they suggested changing the directory
from package.mask to package.mask.d, since all you would need to do is
rename the file package.mask to something like package.mask/oldmasks and
the masks in it would be preserved until you put them in different files
in the package.mask directory and removed them from oldmasks, ultimately
deleting oldmasks.


- -- 
William Hubbs
gentoo accessibility team lead
willi...@gentoo.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkqQWqYACgkQblQW9DDEZTiKxQCfejjxnM/8EmhXglK6bpnzCxIG
emcAn3CFgDOJ27wkNWo46DZh2p/N5J74
=v+g+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to