On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 19:46:56 +0100 Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 20:41:30 +0200 > Tomáš Chvátal <scarab...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > Also we should allow the stuff as directory thingus (portage already > > handles it right). > > That's a seperate thing that needs EAPI control. You'll need to propose > it for EAPI 4 if you want that. Why is that (seriously curious, not disagreeing)? Portage has supported this for quite a while now. Does the current PMS disallow it? What I've really wanted for a long time is different package.mask files for different types of masks. eg. package.mask/broken.mask (qa.mask?) package.mask/removal.mask package.mask/security.mask package.mask/testing.mask etc. If this requires a EAPI change, let me be the first to request it for EAPI 4. ;) -- gcc-porting, Character is what you are in the dark. treecleaner, wxwidgets @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
