On E, 2009-06-22 at 21:23 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 22:13:31 +0200 > Ulrich Mueller <u...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > | (so that certain people can't vote and discuss things based upon > > | what they think the feature is without bothering to find out if it's > > | anything to do with what they assume). > > > > Of course that's not desirable. But can you give a concrete example > > where such a thing happened? > > Yup. Some of leio's huge drawn out objections to EAPI 3 that wasted > huge amounts of my time were based upon him only having read the short > name we chose for things.
Thanks for your very detailed concrete examples where such a thing happened. And I'm sorry to have wasted your precious time by doing the opposite of what you claim here and still objecting to things that don't make sense. Now lets get back to useful things, like giving "code names" that make sense and don't need to be looked up with what is actually meant when they are being referred to in short names. -- Mart Raudsepp Gentoo Developer Mail: l...@gentoo.org Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
