On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 3:56 AM, Tiziano Müller<dev-z...@gentoo.org> wrote: > Default ACCEPT_LICENSE > ---------------------- > Goal: A possible default value for ACCEPT_LICENSE has been proposed. Decide > whether that's ok. What happens to the X11 license files (one for each app)? >
The x11 team[1] came to the conclusion that following RedHat's lead and just using MIT as license for Xorg packages should suffice since they are quite careful about these things. This should definitely be better than the current practice anyway. Are there any other packages or sets of packages with horrible LICENSE behaviour similar to this? 1. Remi, could you reply here and confirm for record purposes? -- ~Nirbheek Chauhan
