2009-05-17 18:20:21 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis napisał(a):
> I would like to suggest to include possibility of using of features of
> bash-4.0 (and older versions) in local scope of EAPI="3" ebuilds.
> 
> I know that it's slightly late, but this change is very easy to implement
> (adjusting RDEPEND of new versions of package managers and updating PMS).

Zac Medico doesn't have objections to this proposition, so I hope that Council
will approve it.

From #gentoo-portage:
[22:40:11] <Arfrever> zmedico: What is your opinion about allowing bash-4.0 
features in EAPI="3"?
...
[22:55:03] <zmedico> Arfrever: that's fine with me
...
[22:56:15] <Arfrever> zmedico: Could you respond to the thread on gentoo-dev 
mailing list about it?
...
[22:56:59] <tanderson> I'd not mind seeing bash 4 in eapi 3; and I don't buy 
ciaran's argument that it'll open the door for all the other latecomers
[22:57:20] igli takes out life-insurance on tanderson ;p
[22:57:22] <zmedico> Arfrever: can you just respond for me and say "zac says 
it's okay with him"? :)
[22:58:52] zmedico is migrating his thunderbird pop setup to use all imap and 
filters in gmial
[22:58:55] <zmedico> *gmail
[22:59:08] <tanderson> igli: disagreeing technically isn't something that can 
get you killed! You're notplaying the odds well my friend
[22:59:23] <Arfrever> zmedico: OK.
[22:59:34] <zmedico> Arfrever: thanks a lot :)

-- 
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply via email to