>>>>> On Fri, 3 Apr 2009, Jim Ramsay wrote: >> Another question is if the existing ones should still be moved to >> some www-* category?
> Should? I have no idea. Where exactly would we move these packages? > The quasi-more-usefully-named www-misc? Yes, if none of the other www-* categories fits. www-misc isn't overpopulated. Since most of the stuff in net-www seems to be browser plugins, we could create www-plugins. But probably it's too few packages to justify an own category. Ulrich
