On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 09:36:29 -0700
Joe Peterson <lava...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > You could use the same absurd argument to say that PN and PV
> > shouldn't be in the filename...
> 
> No...!
> 
> They are needed because:
> 
> 1) versions of the *content*, not the *format* are needed for
> uniqueness

So why's PN in there then?

> 2) it makes sense to have these in the filename, but not
> internal meta-data

For those of us who understand the process, it makes sense to have EAPI
in the filename too.

-- 
Ciaran McCreesh

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to