В Срд, 14/01/2009 в 20:24 -0800, Donnie Berkholz пишет: > On 11:05 Mon 12 Jan , AllenJB wrote: > > In my opinion the cvs commit log and the ChangeLog serve 2 different > > purposes. The cvs log is for developers while the ChangeLog is for > > users. While the cvs log will likely just want to explain what change > > was made, the ChangeLog should explain why it was made. > > So if you want to know both, you need to look in 2 places? That doesn't > seem very nice to me.
We do not distribute portage tree trough cvs and rsync does not have ChangeLog's. But even with cvs, cvs log is very slow ... > Also in a distributed VCS, we'd want to generate > ChangeLogs from the commit logs True. But portage tree is still CVS and until this happened we need document all changes in ChangeLog's. -- Peter.
