On Fri, 3 Oct 2008 23:44:10 -0600 Ryan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Oct 2008 22:24:35 +0200 > > So, no, I'll continue using package.mask for testing just > as it always has been. Sorry. > As far as i understand, the complaint is not about testing itself, but about providing more detailed information in the package.mask file. -- Michal Kurgan http://dev.gentoo.org/~moloh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
