On Monday 22 September 2008 22:25:20 Petteri Räty wrote: > > If you mean something like > > > > built_with_use cat/foo coolfeature || ewarn "bar will be more useful if > > you rebuild cat/foo with USE=coolfeature" > > > > then you can use > > > > has_version 'cat/foo[coolfeature]' || ... > > > > instead. > > What does this report if cat/foo does not have coolfeature use flag in > some version? Meaning can this support cases which need --missing true.
False. If for instance coolfeature was made optional in >=pv you can use logic like: if has_version '>=cat/foo-pv' && ! has_version 'cat/foo[coolfeature]'; then ewarn '...' fi -- Bo Andresen
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
