On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 17:25:42 +0400 Peter Volkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello. > > There are droid fonts package in the tree. Author states that they are > apache licensed [1] (supposedly similar to google's android sdk) but > license itself is not included in the package (only .ttf files are > there). Should we RESTRICT="mirror" in such case or it's safe to drop > such restriction? > > [1] > http://damieng.com/blog/2007/11/14/droid-sans-mono-great-coding-font > > Thank you for any hints, RESTRICT=mirror is probably the safest bet. Both Apache licenses require a copy to be included when redistributing, source or binary. PS. Badger him into switching to OFL while you're at it. ;) -- gcc-porting, by design, by neglect treecleaner, for a fact or just for effect wxwidgets @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
