On Tue, 05 Aug 2008 22:15:11 -0700 Zac Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Does this seem like a desirable way to represent the "virtual" > attribute? Any suggestions?
Again, I'm not so sure that this doesn't represent multiple separable concepts. It seems to imply: * that the install cost is effectively zero * that the resolution cost is effectively zero * that the package does not install any files * that the package does not use any of the (normal?) ebuild phases, and so does not require exclusive pkg_* execution or pkg_* system state preservation. -- Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
