2008-07-26 02:56:24 Mart Raudsepp napisał(a): > On L, 2008-07-26 at 03:39 +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > > Fortunately, the majority of ebuilds/packages are honoring LDFLAGS. Of > > course it's kinda difficult to always check if a package honors it or > > not. But it's a good idea to file a bug for every package that does not > > honor it (without a reason). > > I guess as many are using it to pass --hash-style=gnu in addition to > other things[1], an easy way to find out which don't honor it out of > your installed packages is to scan for ELF files that contain the .hash > ELF section in addition to .gnu.hash ELF section.
The QA check which verifies that LDFLAGS are respected is now in Portage
trunk and will be released in 2.2_rc4. This check is enabled when LDFLAGS
contain "--hash-style=gnu" and "${PN}" != *-bin. Other binary packages
(e.g. net-www/netscape-flash) should set the QA_DT_HASH array/variable.
http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/portage?rev=11205&view=rev
--
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
