On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 06:19:16 +0100 Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 23:16:04 -0600 > Ryan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > if people are just going to RESTRICT tests when they fail (and they > > will, because it's a hell of a lot easier than actually fixing > > them), what's the point of having a testsuite at all? and once a > > testsuite is restricted, it'll stay restricted even if upstream > > fixes the problem because no one will bother checking. > > You're assuming that developers are lazy, incompetent and don't care > about QA. Historically speaking, yes. Well, one and three at least. ;) > If this isn't the case, developers will instead fix or > remove individual test failures where reasonably possible, and will > unrestrict tests when doing version bumps. That would be awesome, and i'd love to be proven wrong. -- gcc-porting, by design, by neglect treecleaner, for a fact or just for effect wxwidgets @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
