On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 14:27:18 -0600 Ryan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In bug #218288, it was brought to our attention that > media-fonts/sharefonts, which has been in our tree under a > public-domain LICENSE, is anything but. Each of the fonts in this > collection is released under a variety of restrictive or non-free > licenses, the majority being shareware licenses that require the user > to make payment to the author for continued use (usually $5 after 30 > days). Many of these fonts are also crippled with the full version > available for a fee. > > As such, I've masked sharefonts for removal in 30 days. There have > been no new releases since it was added to portage in 2002, and no > changes excepting keywording since 2004, so I'm hoping this doesn't > impact too many people. I apologize to those it does. So it seems that Gimp's Script-Fu uses one of the fonts from this collection. Also, that poopy licenses aren't really a reason to remove a package. I'm agreeable to that, however a few of the fonts prohibit distribution in any form without permission of the author. My current plan is to remove those fonts from the package, add the individual licenses for the rest to the tree, and add a Here be Dragons msg to to pkg_setup. Does this seem the correct course of action? -- fonts, gcc-porting, by design, by neglect mips, treecleaner, for a fact or just for effect wxwidgets @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
