2008-04-03 13:35 Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napisał(a): > Petteri Räty wrote: > > Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto kirjoitti: > > > As a final thought, I think this point is a tangent to the old debate > about tree-wide commit privileges and or the scm of the tree. Afterall, if > gentoo-x86 was a git tree and or we had acls in the tree, I don't think we > would be having or would need to have this argument. > > > > > > > > > > If we used git, proxy maintaining would be easier. > > > > True, but with some acls we could also have a different model where people > worked on parts of the tree and where commit privileges didn't pose so many > security risks. With the current practice of doing work in overlays it would > also be simpler to merge the work back into the Portage tree.
Also Subversion would be sufficient. ���^�X��� ��(��&j)b� b�
