On Saturday 15 March 2008, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > On 06:03 Sun 09 Mar , Rajiv Aaron Manglani (rajiv) wrote: > > 1.1 sys-power/nut/nut-2.2.1.ebuild > > > > file : > > http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-power/nut/nut-2.2.1.e > >build?rev=1.1&view=markup plain: > > http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-power/nut/nut-2.2.1.e > >build?rev=1.1&content-type=text/plain > > > > src_install() { > > ... > > > eval fperms 0640 ${NUT_PRIVATE_FILES} > > eval fowners root:nut ${NUT_PRIVATE_FILES} > > > > eval fperms 0644 ${NUT_PUBLIC_FILES} > > eval fowners root:root ${NUT_PUBLIC_FILES} > > ... > > > pkg_postinst() { > > # this is to ensure that everybody that installed old versions still has > > # correct permissions > > > > chown nut:nut "${ROOT}"/var/lib/nut 2>/dev/null > > chmod 0700 "${ROOT}"/var/lib/nut 2>/dev/null > > > > eval chown root:nut "${ROOT}"${NUT_PRIVATE_FILES} 2>/dev/null > > eval chmod 0640 "${ROOT}"${NUT_PRIVATE_FILES} 2>/dev/null > > > > eval chown root:root "${ROOT}"${NUT_PUBLIC_FILES} 2>/dev/null > > eval chmod 0644 "${ROOT}"${NUT_PUBLIC_FILES} 2>/dev/null > > Is there any reason why eval is used in either of these places?
i'd open a bug so it doesnt get lost -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
