"Fabio Erculiani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted
below, on  Tue, 18 Mar 2008 12:00:40 +0100:

> Ok thanks, is there any specific GLEP already? Or is it just a Paludis
> proposal? I am just wondering when this stuff will hit the tree.

Portage was and remains the "official" PM (there's some serious political 
history there if you wish to check the list archives), so until it 
supports the EAPI (including the two GLEP elements that haven't yet been 
officially adopted and are still in development in terms of council 
approval), such ebuilds are very unlikely to be allowed in the official 
tree.

The announcement took some pains to make it quite clear those ebuilds 
weren't headed for the tree anything like soon, but not being a regular 
here, you probably missed the subtext.  They were quite specific that it 
was ONLY for the live SVN ebuilds, which are severely discouraged in the 
tree anyway for QA reasons (snapshots under certain conditions, live 
ebuilds are usually overlay material only), NOT for ultimate stable 
candidates, which is by practical trend what the tree is more and more 
considered to be for as the experimental stuff heads for the overlays.

-- 
Duncan - List replies preferred.   No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master."  Richard Stallman

-- 
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

Reply via email to