Which *actual* packages would benefit from changing the current <span index="4" id="message4" name="incorrect" class="incorrect">css</span>USE flag to something different?Of course, I'm not talking about benefit for packages but about benefit for users (me included).
Yes, of course, but unless there are packages with some unusual USE flag for CSS support, I don't really see your point because our users are now used to the "<span index="4" id="message4" name="incorrect" class="incorrect">css</span>" USE flag in its current meaning.
For example, k3b has used the "<span index="4" id="message4" name="incorrect" class="incorrect">css</span>" USE flag since 2005-05-12 (i. e. for more than 2 years) and I don't want to confuse our users by changing the meaning of existing, widely-used USE flags.
<span index="4" id="message4" name="incorrect" class="incorrect">css</span> is a known abbreviation and it's meaning has nothing to dowith dvd writing, so making it more clear is a good thing to do.
Yes - if it hadn't been used for something completely different for years now. -- Best regards, Wulf
pgpVtSd4i5NYb.pgp
Description: PGP Digital Signature
