Il Thursday 31 January 2008 02:00:36 Robin H. Johnson ha scritto: > On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 04:14:48PM -0800, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > > It really is best done in the tree first, so everything is correct for > > the snapshot. We didn't have much issue last time because we push > > "manifest1_obsolete" into the snapshot, so digests are removed, anyway, > > but I'd *really* prefer if this were done prior to the snapshot being > > made. > > Ok, so we're just blocking on the docs guys. > > Are they actively working on it so I can go ahead and take the digests > out anyway?
jkt has recently committed some fix: http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo/xml/htdocs/doc/en/bugzilla-howto.xml?r1=1.10&r2=1.11 http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo/xml/htdocs/doc/en/gentoo-ppc-faq.xml?r1=1.66&r2=1.67 http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo/xml/htdocs/doc/en/handbook/hb-working-portage.xml?r1=1.68&r2=1.69 I don't know exactly how many other docs must be changed accordingly, it's better to ping some GDP member to get a better feedback. Cheers, -- Davide Cendron Gentoo Documentation Project Italian Lead Translator http://www.gentoo.org/doc/it/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
