On Thu, 2008-01-10 at 14:32 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Thursday 10 January 2008, Michael Haubenwallner wrote: > > On Tue, 2008-01-08 at 14:37 -0800, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > > > Implicit dependencies waste more time than pretty much anything else. > > > Almost all circular dependency issues we currently have are due to > > > implicit dependencies. > > > > Maybe OT (an idea in a very early state): > > > > For the implicit dependencies one could think of path-sandbox to help: > > > > Inform libsandbox which files are provided by packages both in *DEPEND > > and the system package set, and let it completely deny access to > > not-listed files. > > > > Or let it report any access to not-listed files to help finding the > > implicit dependencies. > > it'd be quite some time before this would see implementation, but can you > summarize the ideas and open a feature request in bugzilla please
done: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=205312 /haubi/ -- Michael Haubenwallner Gentoo on a different level -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
