On Wed, 9 Jan 2008 20:06:00 +0100 "Wulf C. Krueger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wednesday, 09. January 2008 19:45:38 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > > > Then the one particular part of 3.5.5 that's affected gets fixed > > > > and priority keyworded. > > > So you suggest that mips keeps doing nothing and expect others to > > > work *more* in exchange for that? > > Well, most users will simply ignore or postpone the mass upgrade, > > So far so good. If users postpone it, that's entirely their > responsibility.
It's all very well to say that, but which do you care about? Covering your ass and claiming that you have a secure distribution, or the security of end user systems? -- Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
