Chris Gianelloni wrote: > I have foo 1.0, which is mips. There is foo 2.0, which is stable > everywhere else. The foo 1.0 ebuild does not conform to current ebuild > standards. I want to commit changes to foo 2.0, and repoman won't allow > me due to problems in foo 1.0, but I don't want to WASTE MY TIME on foo > 1.0, because it's been EOL for 2 years
Why don't fix repoman not to scream about such issues, then? Cheers, -jkt -- cd /local/pub && more beer > /dev/mouth
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
