On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 11:37:01 +0100
Thomas Pani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As cat/pkg-ver ultimately is ONE file in the filesystem, there's no
> reason to put any information about the EAPI in the filename.

Sure there is. It's the sanest place to put it such that it's available
when it's needed -- that is, before the ebuild is sourced.

> I still don't get why EAPI=xxx is soooo bad. Obviously the GLEP (and
> the last 500 comments lack to explain that. Ebuilds are bash.
> EAPI=xxx is bash syntax.

Uh, I've explained it far too many times in this thread already. Go
back and read. Don't post again until you understand it.

-- 
Ciaran McCreesh

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to