On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 22:08:52 +0100 Thomas de Grenier de Latour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There's no need to introduce a potential infinity of new files > extensions for that. A single one is enough: just call files which > use the rule i've proposed "foo.gbuild" instead of "foo.ebuild", and > you're done.
You're done until someone wants to introduce a change large enough that it breaks the dodgy pattern matching package managers are doing to get the EAPI currently. Which isn't that unlikely -- consider the original purpose for metadata.xml for an example. -- Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
