On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 21:38:08 +0100 Fabian Groffen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just to have it spelt out, what you suggest here is that EAPI has a > single value, a word or a number, that refers to a set of "features > and rules", if I understand correctly. > > With this way of using EAPI I fail to see why EAPIs aren't orderable. > Even with the example you gave in the previous mail, it looks like a > perfect succession of EAPIs.
It doesn't *have* to be a perfect succession. It's entirely possible that there will be, say, two divergent EAPI branches or even that there will be a completely unrelated new EAPI format. -- Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
