Just to bring to a wider audience the discussion that we had on bug #140180 [1].
While documenting new-style virtuals for devmanual we began to discuss what the LICENSE variable for the virtual ebuilds should contain. For the reasons listed on the bug, we came to a conclusion that the LICENSE variable should be empty for these ebuilds. A brief list of the reasons: * the ebuild doesn't really install anything * the ebuild itself is already licensed under GPLv2 as is every other ebuild in the tree * ACCEPT_LICENSE accepts an empty LICENSE, so the virtual is automatically accepted * if the above were not true, we would have the fun maintainence nightmare of having to list every license that could satisfy the virtual in the LICENSE variable So long as everyone understands this, I'll go ahead and commit the new documentation to devmanual and ask zmedico to commit the repoman change to make sure LICENSE="" in the virtual category. Thanks, [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140180 -- Mark Loeser email - halcy0n AT gentoo DOT org web - http://www.halcy0n.com
pgpEHiB1YmrR7.pgp
Description: PGP signature