* Robert Buchholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-08 05:53]: > On Thursday, 4. October 2007, Josh Sled wrote: > > Wolfram Schlich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > * Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-03 19:12]: > > >> On 12:43 Wed 03 Oct , Wolfram Schlich wrote: > > >> > And *please*, don't send such mails to this > > >> > list *and* to my address in addition. > > >> > > >> You can add a procmail rule to detect duplicates using a cache and > > >> checking Message-Id, with formail. Examples of this are all over > > >> the place. It's a useful rule to have for many reasons besides > > >> this. > > > > > > Yeah, but it's unpredictable *which* one of the two mails makes > > > it first onto my system, thus the one *not* sent to the list might > > > > Sigh. > > > > It is the same message, addressed To/Cc: you and/or the list, no > > matter which one is delivered first. So just put all list(+private) > > filtering before personal filtering. > > That doesn't work when filtering for List-Id headers which can be nicely > used with regex matching like so: > [...]
Yup, I *only* filter mailing lists by list related headers like List-Id: and others -- filtering list mails by To:/Cc:/Subject: headers is broken by design. My current gentoo-commits reply spamfilter looks like this: --8<-- ## Gentoo spam :0 * ^From:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * ^Subject.*\[gentoo-commits\] * ! ^List-Id: /dev/null --8<-- -- Regards, Wolfram Schlich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Gentoo Linux * http://dev.gentoo.org/~wschlich/ -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
