> > Something that annoys me is the license : there is [3], [4] and [5], > > so GPL-2 might probably be fine, but I'm definitely not a lawyer... > > You can add several licenses to LICENSE. And a lot of packages are > LPPL, so you really need to adjust it. There has been a discussion on > the TeXLive about the licenses [1].
thanks for the link, switched to LPPL1.3c & GPL-2 as base licenses plus some extra ones based on fedora's reviews on a per package basis. > > Now a question to arch teams : Should I keyword this for systems > > I've tested it or just add without keywords and let you do another > > layer of checks ? I've been using it on ~x86 (and hardenend but > > mpost had problems), ~amd64 and ~ppc64 (this one has some missing > > deps, but don't worry I'll poke you as soon as I'll have done extra > > checks ;) ). > > I am all for new keywording as it is a major step forward from teTeX. will do like that Alexis.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
