Donnie Berkholz kirjoitti: > On 12:40 Fri 10 Aug , Duncan wrote: >> Agreed. Within the limited scope of dodoc, under what legitimate >> circumstances might a file /not/ be there to "dodoc" for a user, when >> it's there for a maintainer? (OTOH, now that portage is recompressing >> all such files based on the PORTAGE_COMPRESS setting, I suppose it's >> possible the user screwed up their PORTAGE_COMPRESS setting. Still, if >> they screw up portage variables they should /expect/ it to have problems.) > > if use uncommon_use_flag && ! use another_uncommon_flag; then > dodoc foo > fi > > Thanks, > Donnie
And you think maintainers are not needed to test use flags they think are uncommon? Regards,
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
