Chris Gianelloni wrote:
On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 01:08 +0100, George Prowse wrote:
from http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/coc.xml
Look at the Council logs from the CoC being approved and the ones since.
We asked for real guidelines so we could specifically avoid this sort of
problem from happening.
Then the council are to blame for having the CoC readily available under
their *own* project pages.
It has your's and most of the council's names as reviewers and after 3
months nothing has been said about it. The lack of activity and where it
is situated make it look like it is official policy.
All this is immaterial anyway because even if it had been extensively
discussed at length then the proctors would still have acted the same,
or would you have preferred that they held a meeting first and then a
focus group and then a coffee morning before trying to stop a thread
descending into anarchy? I cant see it would have gone any different to
1) warning. 2) if ignored then act
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
