On Sunday, May 13, 2007 09:57:05 AM Matti Bickel wrote: > If the general feeling is that ion is > unacceptable in the tree, i'll mask it pending removal.
Having read the threads you referenced, I don't think there's much room for a compromise. In the conversation with you, Matti, he argues that elog is not "prominent" enough, users don't read USE flag descriptions, etc. So those issues seem unresolved. Reading the rest of those mail exchanges makes it even look worse. I don't think he'll ever really be satisfied. So I'd suggest to drop ion3. Best regards, Wulf
pgpGVtyQEfkd8.pgp
Description: PGP signature
