On Wednesday 02 May 2007, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tuesday 01 May 2007, Piotr Jaroszyński wrote: > > > There was some discussion about forcing/not forcing tests in > > > EAPI-1, but there was clearly no compromise. > > > > the compromise was that requiring in spec is wrong ... default > > handling of tests is up to the package manager / profiles / teams > > That's a lousy solution.
all ive said is that it's better than what you proposed: making src_test mandatory. that is not nor ever will be a viable solution. > *Something* needs to change. There are several > solutions better than the current situation; the question is whether > anyone can find one that is perfect rather than one that is merely a > lot better. the only feasible thing that should go into EAPI is to change the *default* behavior of src_test from not being run to being run ... thus all existing methods for controlling test behavior will continue to work the same -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
