Ferris McCormick wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 17:30:32 -0500
Steev Klimaszewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
<snip>
Personally I understand why flameeyes took that to bugzilla; how else
could he say he'd gone thru the appropriate channels? Devrel (a
group, not an individual) weren't set up to respond quickly as others
have informed us all.
Case in point: you need to distinguish between flameeyes leaving (again)
as a publicity stunt because his attempt to blackmail devrel failed and
flameeyes' stated reason for leaving...
<snip>
It was an ultimatum. He goes or I go, it was not blackmail. FFS, can
we please stop calling it blackmail?
As I recall, flameeyes made the statement to kloeri, and kloeri called
it blackmail. Whatever you call it, in business, issuing such an
ultimatum is one of the quickest ways to become unemployed.
So you'd rather let one of the best employees go rather than chastise a
worker who is leaving soon? Thats just cutting off your nose to spite
your face.
It's good to see it has only taken 3 or is it 4 or 5 devs to leave
before anyone thinks about doing something.
George
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
