Chris Gianelloni wrote:
On Tue, 2007-03-13 at 16:00 +0100, Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen wrote:
Uhh, no. This gets enforced on devs and users alike.
I wouldn't bring it up in the first place, but we've had previous examples
with devs calling other devs not so kind things and to my knowledge it didn't
result in any action. I seem to remember a rather active dev taking it not so
lightly, resulting in one less dev and no action from Devrel/Council.
What exactly do previous examples have to do with us saying that our
past efforts didn't work and our trying to come up with a *new* way of
doing these things to not repeat past problems/mistakes?
Let me just clarify this.
We don't care how things were done in the past. We are looking
*forward* and trying to come up with the best solution from here on out.
I look at anything with a gentoo.org address as our house. While some
might disagree with this statement, I'm pretty sure this is the stance
we're taking on it.
So this doesn't apply to the Gentoo IRC channels?
*sigh*
I wasn't aware that I would have to spell out everything. How about
this, then?
EVERYTHING with gentoo.org or #gentoo-* in it? Is that good enough?
(Looking forward to the day when we don't have to be so damned pedantic
in everything that we write.)
I would like to point you #4 in the CoC draft - "*Being judgmental,
mean-spirited or insulting.* It is possible to challenge someone
(respectfully, of course), in a way that empowers without being
judgemental."
;) George
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
