On Saturday 03 March 2007, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > If there's some value to be found in having PMS ready by a particular > date that I'm missing then I want to hear it so that I can spend more > time working on PMS and less on other things.
semantics aside, how much time you dedicate is entirely up to you and really, i dont think there's too many developers who honestly care how that affects you i consider having a spelled out EAPI=0 spec to be quite valuable and worth spending time on and i have to say that i get the feeling that i'm not alone on this point having a behavior explanation cuts back on the "well it works in portage so go screw yourself" mentality and replaces it with "package manger foo does not behave according to spec" which certainly opens up the door for people to use alternative package managers with the Gentoo ebuild tree (hmm we're gonna have to stop referring to it as the "Gentoo portage tree" eh) -mike
pgpMMoGLK5Hvz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
