Marius Mauch wrote: > In that case adding >=bash-3 to "system" isn't sufficient. I'll leave > the detailed explanation to Brian, but the only thing you can rely on > in the ebuild environment is what the used portage version has in it's > dep strings when it was merged. > Not that it has much practical relevance given the age of bash-3 > and things depending on it (don't think anybody is still on bash-2), > but adding it to "system" wouldn't help those people.
The details are not important. The main point here is being able to use bash-3 features. What do we need to get us there? Thanks, Donnie
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
