Jakub Moc wrote: > Ciaran McCreesh wrote: >> On Sat, 9 Sep 2006 21:28:10 +0100 Roy Marples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> | On Saturday 09 September 2006 21:25, Christel Dahlskjaer wrote: >> | > Drupal has had QA bug #98542 open for over a year now, and has seen >> | > no progress in resolving it. It has now been package.masked, and >> | > unless someone jumps up to fix the outstanding issues will be >> | > removed in 30 days. >> | >> | Unless anyone else steps up, I'll take it as I use Drupal for my home >> | site. >> >> Given Drupal's history, is it really worth maintaining it in the tree? > > I don't think so. > > Upstream completely sucks and keeps changing the tarballs silently over > and over again, so the only solution to the above bug is to remove all > of the modules/themes/etc. from the ebuild. > >
So which sucks, upstream or our unbending policy? -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
