<snip>

> > I like this option better than sticking another file into the public 
> > tree that no user will ever need.
> 
> Instead, modifying the eclass metadata and adding two new keys, that 
> users will never need is fine? :)
> 
> This isn't really user data, tiz developer data; thus the user bit 
> doesn't matter.  Sarcasm aside, what *does* matter as that the 
> purpose of this is a temporary hack to cover portages ass.
</snip>

In light of it being useless data for users is there any reason not to
add the files to CVS and then pull them out before the tree is synced
with the master mirror as part of that script?

--Dan

-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Reply via email to