-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 7 Aug 2006, Peter Gordon wrote:
Zac Medico wrote:
The difference with use.force is that it prevents flags, that are deemed
extremely important, from being accidentally disabled by the user.
If they were so "extremely important" then they would not be optional,
and hence not even be USE flags at all, no? Or am I missing something?
This could allow for us to get rid of the nofoo use flag nomenclature that
folks have been doing for functionality that is highly suggested to be on
by default.
Cheers,
- --
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc Team Co-Lead
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFE2Nc2dKvgdVioq28RAuwsAJ4vK8SgA1ghZmon2zRWIltyA/8OCQCcD6Dn
XYD/+4B+vVEDYpz9ahGpcxM=
=cP0R
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list